Understanding
Friedreich Ataxia

As FA progresses, a patient's mFARS
score will worsen (increase)

The modified Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (mFARS) is a clinically validated neurological assessment1

The mFARS provides a detailed evaluation of a patient’s status and is generally accepted as a clinical trial endpoint due to its correlation with disease progression.1

In clinical practice, HCPs should use the assessment tool they feel is best for their patients.

mFARS measures1

The mFARS is made up of 4
components that focus on
functional abilities

The mFARS is scored on a scale of 0 to 93, with higher scores indicating more severe physical impairment.1

mFARS measures1

Lower limb coordination

Assessed Function: Coordination of legs and feet

Example Assessments and Scoring: Heel-along-shin slide, Heel-to-shin tap, 16 points total

Clinical Extrapolations of Possible Effects on Patient Abilities: Closely related to upright stability, also an important contributor to decline in ambulatory patients. Affects activities like putting on socks and shoes.

Upright stability

Assessed Function: Sitting, standing, and walking

Example Assessments and Scoring: Sitting posture, Stance, Gait, 36 points total

Clinical Extrapolations of Possible Effects on Patient Abilities: Assessment of individual ambulatory ability. Affects activities like walking, sitting in a car, standing in a line, and showering.

Upper limb coordination

Assessed Function: Fine motor coordination

Example Assessments and Scoring: Finger to finger, Nose to finger, Dysmetria, 36 points total

Clinical Extrapolations of Possible Effects on Patient Abilities: Ability to complete activities of daily living, such as getting dressed, eating, brushing teeth, typing, pointing, reaching, and turning a doorknob.

Bulbar function

Assessed Function: Speech clarity and strength and volume of coughing

Example Assessments and Scoring: Forceful cough, speech, 5 points total

Clinical Extrapolations of Possible Effects on Patient Abilities: Affects the ability to communicate clearly. Patients may also be at increased risk for respiratory infection.3

An increase in mFARS score could indicate further
loss of function that may affect everyday tasks

A natural history study of untreated patients found that FA progresses on average ~2 points per year 4

Mean change from baseline in mFARS4

The mFARS is a validated research tool in clinical research settings. However, when monitoring FA progression in individual patients with mFARS, it is important to note the following:

  • High variability in clinical presentation among FA patients and is meant to assess progression at a population level5
  • Variability in examiners assessing and scoring each patient6
  • Relative insensitivity to change over brief periods of time6

Given these variances, it is crucial for HCPs to select the most appropriate tool tailored to the specific needs of their patients when monitoring FA progression.

A treatment option for FA is available