The mFARS is scored on a scale of 0 to 93, with higher scores indicating more severe physical impairment.1
Assessed Function: Coordination of legs and feet
Example Assessments and Scoring: Heel-along-shin slide, Heel-to-shin tap, 16 points total
Clinical Extrapolations of Possible Effects on Patient Abilities: Closely related to upright stability, also an important contributor to decline in ambulatory patients.2 Affects activities like putting on socks and shoes.
Assessed Function: Sitting, standing, and walking
Example Assessments and Scoring: Sitting posture, Stance, Gait, 36 points total
Clinical Extrapolations of Possible Effects on Patient Abilities: Assessment of individual ambulatory ability. Affects activities like walking, sitting in a car, standing in a line, and showering.
Assessed Function: Fine motor coordination
Example Assessments and Scoring: Finger to finger, Nose to finger, Dysmetria, 36 points total
Clinical Extrapolations of Possible Effects on Patient Abilities: Ability to complete activities of daily living, such as getting dressed, eating, brushing teeth, typing, pointing, reaching, and turning a doorknob.
Assessed Function: Speech clarity and strength and volume of coughing
Example Assessments and Scoring: Forceful cough, speech, 5 points total
Clinical Extrapolations of Possible Effects on Patient Abilities: Affects the ability to communicate clearly. Patients may also be at increased risk for respiratory infection.3
The mFARS is a validated research tool in clinical research settings. However, when monitoring FA progression in individual patients with mFARS, it is important to note the following:
Given these variances, it is crucial for HCPs to select the most appropriate tool tailored to the specific needs of their patients when monitoring FA progression.